Cabo

This property is consistently cited as one of the few, if not the only, ultra-luxury hotel in Cabo that maintains exceptional service standards. It's highlighted as a preferred choice for honeymoons and couples, praised for its speakeasy, authentic food offerings, and director of romance. It is considered a benchmark for luxury in the region.

Honest negative: While generally lauded, one quote notes that the rooms are 'getting a little jaded'.

A highly regarded property that evokes strong positive sentiment, frequently mentioned as a top choice for luxury stays. It's praised for its service and overall experience, although some find specific F&B items, like miniature horchata, to be outrageously priced.

Honest negative: A $20 mini bottle of horchata was considered 'obnoxious' and not worth the price, failing to meet expectations for its cost.

This property is noted for its two miles of pristine, swimmable white sand beach and modern, luxurious rooms. It's considered a strong contender for families and couples, with designer restaurants like Milos and Mozz. Some recent guests experienced service that 'still needs some work' as the resort was not fully operating.

Honest negative: Service was described as needing 'some work' by recent guests who felt it hadn't yet reached its full potential.

Praised for its cliffside restaurant, which is considered a destination in itself even for non-guests. The property is noted for its on-site and walkable dining options, offering a high level of luxury, potentially bordering on $2k per night.

Honest negative: Borderline $2k a night pricing suggests a high cost, though specific service or amenity negatives are not detailed.

Recognized for having one of the few swimmable beaches in Cabo, it offers incredible service and great food. However, it also comes with high prices, with $20 pool beers noted as a significant point of contention and failing the 'feels fair' test.

Honest negative: Pool beers are priced at $20, which is considered an outrageous premium and fails the 'feels fair' test when compared to other luxury hotels.

Mentioned as a luxury option, but also associated with high prices for services like massages ($475 for 60 minutes). One user expressed that it 'felt entitled to my money without providing the service.'

Honest negative: A user felt the property 'felt entitled to my money without providing the service,' implying a disconnect between cost and value delivered.

This all-inclusive property is noted for offering a 'crappy yacht' experience for a high price, which was deemed 'horrifically bad value'. The all-inclusive nature is mentioned, but the specific yacht excursion is a point of negative feedback.

Honest negative: Renting their yacht for a private party of up to 4 people for 3 hours, including sandwiches and fruit, cost $2500 and was deemed 'horrifically bad value'.

This property is praised for its swimmable cove and amazing service, positioning it as a desirable luxury option within the region.

Honest negative: No specific honest negative was provided by the community.

Mentioned as a top hotel that some would be happy to try if a decent deal was available, indicating it's on the radar for luxury travellers, though specific details on its strengths are limited.

Honest negative: No specific honest negative was provided by the community.

Listed as a property in Cabo, but without further community detail to assess its specific strengths or weaknesses.

Honest negative: No specific honest negative was provided by the community.

This property is mentioned in the context of a toddler's enjoyment and also for its spa pricing ($440 for a 60-minute massage). It's noted that the spa has a private pool with wait staff, which was seen as a way to justify the cost.

Honest negative: A 60-minute massage at $440 is considered expensive, with the justification being the use of the spa's private pool area.

Mentioned in a travel list, but without specific commentary on its performance in Cabo.

Honest negative: No specific honest negative was provided by the community.

Listed in a travel itinerary, but not located in Cabo.

Honest negative: Not applicable as the property is not in Cabo.

Listed in a travel itinerary, but not located in Cabo.

Honest negative: Not applicable as the property is not in Cabo.

Described as 'lovely,' this property is recommended to book through a member for optimal value, suggesting a specific booking channel is advantageous.

Honest negative: To get the best value, booking through a member is advised, implying standard direct booking might not be optimal.

Explicitly stated as 'not a FAT accommodation option,' indicating it falls short of the ultra-luxury standards expected by the community.

Honest negative: Stated directly as 'not a FAT accommodation option' and 'not even close' to the expected standard.

Mentioned as a recommendation for those considering Rosewood Las Ventanas, suggesting it's a comparable luxury option in a different destination (Anguilla), not Cabo.

Honest negative: Not applicable as the property is not in Cabo.

Mentioned as an example of declining service standards in top-tier suites, even in established New York hotels.

Honest negative: The level of incompetence and service was 'astounding' and 'shocking how bad' it was, even in an Empire suite.

Cited for past negative experiences with service in top-tier villas/suites, and compared unfavourably to Cap Juluca for those seeking a more boutique feel than a family-oriented property.

Honest negative: Past bad experiences with top-tier villas or suites led to a perception of declining service.

Included in a list of properties where the community experienced 'shocking' service incompetence, suggesting inconsistency in service quality.

Honest negative: Ranked among properties with 'shocking' service incompetence, indicating past issues.